The U.S. equities market is on an historic role; up over 200% since the great recession of ’08-’09. As an investor, mostly for retirement, this is a great thing for my stock portfolio and has helped me tremendously. The recent spike since the presidential election is the part I find troubling. There is an old saying, what’s old is new again, and that should scare the crap out of anyone with money in U.S. Securities.
I know most of my readers are not market saavy investors, and the topic of market technicalities could put a four year old jacked up on pop-rocks and jolt soda to sleep in a New York minute (yes I just aged myself). However, without getting too technical, let’s look at some very curious information. Stocks are a piece of a company; hence their name, “share”. It’s a small piece of the ownership and entitles you to a commensurate piece of the “profit” of that company, both today’s profits, and future profits. As logic would suggest, a share in a profitable company with a bright future is historically worth more than an equivalent share in an unprofitable company with a dismal future (anyone visit a Sear’s store lately?). That paradigm has held since the birth of publicly traded stocks. The value of a stock overall can be viewed in context of how much it costs for a share relative to how much profit that company is making and will make in the future. This is known as a Price to Earning Ratio, or PE Ratio (asleep yet?).
So, I’ll skip to the punch line. Historically, over the last 150 years, the stock market as a whole has averaged a PE Ratio of 16, with some variation up and down based on the health of the overall economy; ratios go up when the economy is growing or coming out of a recession, and go down when the economy is entering a recession or slowing down. Today’s market PE ratio is 31.
The last time it was this high was in 2000 before the tech bubble burst. Before that? September 1929. Nervous?
No amount of promised corporate tax rate cut (which hasn’t actually passed Congress yet), can account for that ratio being so high. Some analysts are questioning if the old historical paradigm of stock value is changing. Has the Market Paradigm Shifted? The short answer is no. The long answer, is that the market is at unsustainably high-levels because people set market prices, and as I’ve come to conclude based on 40 years of empirical observation; people are stupid and greedy.
When traders investors gamblers ignore basic market fundamentals and analyst data, they are acting as all humans do… with self-interest. No one wants to see this bull-market slow down, because that would mean admitting to a long-standing logical fallacy that Wall-street has pushed on society for years; that low taxes (or the promise thereof) equals growth. It simply doesn’t hold true with empirical study, and by continuing to drive this bubble into uncharted territory, the market is openly admitting it has no foresight, no self-control, and more importantly, no interest in facts.
So the next time someone tells you they want something because it’s “good for businesses, the market wants it”; politely remind them that the market is just a junkie looking for a fix so they don’t have to come down off their high. Junkies will tell you anything and everything to avoid facing sobriety and the consequences of their actions.
(cover art credit – National Geographic)